Ileto v. Glock Inc.

Good Law
349 F.3d 1191·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9984·2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 23659
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 20, 200302-56197California18,669 words

Opinion

Opinion

349 F.3d 1191 Lilian S. ILETO, an individual and mother to Joseph S. Ileto, deceased; Joshua Stepakoff, a minor, by his parents Loren Lieb and Alan B. Stepakoff; Mindy Gale Finkelstein, a minor, by her parents David and Donna Finkelstein; Benjamin Kadish, a minor by his parents Eleanor and Charles Kadish; Nathan Lawrence Powers, a minor by his parents Gail and John Michael Powers, for himself and on behalf of a class of persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. GLOCK INC., a Georgia Corporation; China North Industries Corp., a Chinese entity aka Norinco; Davis Industries, a California Corporation; Republic Arms Inc., a California Corporation; Jimmy L. Davis, an individual; Bushmaster Firearms, a Maine Corporation; RSR Management Corporation; RSR Wholesale Guns Seattle Inc., Defendants-Appellees, and Maadi, an Egyptian business entity; Imbel, a Brazilian business entity; The Loaner Pawnshop Too, a Washington Corporation; David McGee, an individual; Glock GMBH, an Austrian business entity, Defendant. No. 02-56197. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 3, 2003. Filed November 20, 2003. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.