Lolli v. County Of Orange

Good Law
351 F.3d 410·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10031·2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 23746
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 21, 200302-56309California7,237 words

Opinion

Opinion

351 F.3d 410 John Kenneth LOLLI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF ORANGE, a political subdivision of the State of California; Michael S. Carona, individually and as Sheriff of Orange County; John Rocky Hewitt, individually and in his official capacity (Assistant Sheriff); Toledo, individually and in his official capacity (Sheriff Sergeant) aka Doe 3; Meyer, individually and in his official capacity (Sheriff Sergeant) aka Doe 4; Walker, individually and in their official capacities (Sheriff Deputies) aka Doe 5-8; Baum, Deputy individually and in his official capacity aka Does 9-10; Finlay, Deputy individually and in his official capacity aka Does 5-8; Kent, Deputy individually and in his official capacity aka Does 5-8; Richards, Deputy individually and in his official capacity aka Does 5-8; Breaton, Deputy individually and in his official capacity aka Does 9-10, Defendants-Appellees. No. 02-56309. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 4, 2003. Filed November 21, 2003. Robert L. Bastian, Jr., and Marina R. Dini, Law Offices of Bastian & Dini, Los Angeles, California, for the plaintiff-appellant. Albert P. Ballog, Jr., and Daniel R. Sullivan,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.