Glen Holly Entertainment Inc. v. Tektronix Inc.

Good Law
352 F.3d 367·2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 25138
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 12, 200301-56447California8,509 words

Opinion

Opinion

352 F.3d 367 GLEN HOLLY ENTERTAINMENT INC., a California Corporation dba Digital Images, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TEKTRONIX INC., an Oregon Corporation; Avid Technology, Inc, a Delaware Corporation, Defendants-Appellees. No. 01-56447. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted October 9, 2002 — Pasadena, California. Filed September 9, 2003. Amended December 12, 2003. Jeffrey T. Makoff, Makoffs LLP, San Francisco, CA, for the plaintiff-appellant. Stanley M. Gorinson, Kilpatrick Stockton LLP, Washington, DC, for the defendants-appellees. James C. Burling, Hale & Dorr, LLP, Boston, MA, for the defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; Stephen V. Wilson, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-99-02476-SVW. Before STEPHEN REINHARDT, STEPHEN S. TROTT and BARRY G. SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges. ORDER AMENDING OPINION AND DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC AND AMENDED OPINION TROTT, Circuit Judge. ORDER 1 The Opinion filed on September 9, 2003, and published at 343 F.3d 1000 (9th Cir.2003) is amended as follows: 2 Footnote 4 appearing on page 1013 is deleted and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.