Feitelberg v. Merrill Lynch & Co.

Good Law
353 F.3d 765·2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 26266
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 24, 200302-17236California181 words

Opinion

Opinion

353 F.3d 765 Jerome FEITELBERG, On Behalf of Himself, All Others Similarly Situated, And The General Public, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MERRILL LYNCH & CO., a Delaware Corporation; Thomas Mazzucco; Henry Blodget, Defendants-Appellees. No. 02-17236. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted December 5, 2003 — San Francisco, California. Filed December 24, 2003. Solomon B. Cera, Gold Bennett Cera & Sidener LLP, San Francisco, California, for the Plaintiff-Appellant. Jonathan C. Dickey, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Palo Alto, California, for the Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; Marilyn H. Patel, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-02-03072-MHP. Before: Myron H. BRIGHT, * Dorothy W. NELSON, and Pamela Ann RYMER, Circuit Judges. ORDER PER CURIAM. 1 We affirm for reasons stated by the district court in its opinion, Feitelberg v. Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., 234 F.Supp.2d 1043 (N.D.Cal.2002). * 2 AFFIRMED. Notes: * Honorable Myron H. Bright, Senior United States Circuit Judge for the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation * We deny Feitelberg's Request for Judicial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.