Mattel Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Walking Mountain Productions, a California Business Entity Tom Forsythe, an Individual D/B/A Walking Mountain Productions, Mattel Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Walking Mountain Productions, a California Business Entity Tom Forsythe, an Individual D/B/A Walking Mountain Productions

Good Law

353 F.3d 792·69 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1257·2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 26294

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 29, 200301-56695California12,597 words

Opinion

353 F.3d 792 MATTEL INC., a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WALKING MOUNTAIN PRODUCTIONS, a California Business Entity; Tom Forsythe, an individual d/b/a Walking Mountain Productions, Defendants-Appellees. Mattel Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Walking Mountain Productions, a California Business Entity; Tom Forsythe, an individual d/b/a Walking Mountain Productions, Defendants-Appellants. No. 01-56695. No. 01-57193. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 6, 2003 — Pasadena, California. Filed December 29, 2003. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Adrian M. Pruetz (argued), Michael T. Zeller, Edith Ramirez and Enoch Liang, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges, LLP, Los Angeles, California, for the plaintiff-appellant-cross-appellee. Annette L. Hurst (argued), Douglas A. Winthrop and Simon J. Frankel, Howard, Rice, Nemerovski, Canady, Falk & Rabkin, APC, San Francisco, California, and Peter J. Eliasberg, ACLU, Los Angeles, California, for the defendants-appellees-cross-appellants. Annette L. Hurst, Douglas A. Winthrop and Simon J. Frankel, Howard, Rice, Nemerovski, Canady, Falk…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.

Parties

Mattel Inc., a Delaware Corporation
Plaintiff
Walking Mountain Productions, a California Business Entity Tom Forsythe, an Individual D/B/A Walking Mountain Productions, Mattel Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Walking Mountain Productions, a California Business Entity Tom Forsythe, an Individual D/B/A Walking Mountain Productions
Defendant

Cites (55)

353 F.3d 792
4 F. App'x 400
289 F.3d 623
336 F.3d 811
510 U.S. 569
8 F. Cas. 615
109 F.3d 1394
471 U.S. 539
305 F.3d 924
313 F.3d 1093
137 F.3d 109
809 F. Supp. 267
188 U.S. 239
296 F.3d 894
349 F.3d 622
677 F.2d 180
964 F.2d 965
229 F. Supp. 2d 315
875 F.2d 994
25 Cal. 4th 387
151 L. Ed. 2d 692
85 F.3d 422
136 L. Ed. 2d 714
84 F.3d 363
511 F.2d 225
121 F.3d 503
103 F.3d 830
179 F.3d 704
765 F.2d 1440
746 F.2d 587
13 F.3d 285
987 F.2d 1450
823 F.2d 316
510 U.S. 517
886 F.2d 1545
108 L. Ed. 2d 496
127 F.3d 821
505 U.S. 763
251 F.3d 1252
718 F. Supp. 1159
886 F.2d 490
815 F. Supp. 691
35 F.3d 65
297 U.S. 288
341 U.S. 123
831 F.2d 1503
11 F.3d 1460
318 F.3d 900
85 F.3d 407
411 F.2d 350
413 F.2d 1126
514 U.S. 159
456 U.S. 844
70 F.3d 267
599 F.2d 341