United States v. James Daychild, United States of America v. Patrick O. Neiss

Good Law
357 F.3d 1082·2004 WL 292093·2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 2535
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 17, 200402-30184, 02-30435California11,417 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gould, J.

Co-defendants James Daychild and Patrick Neiss had the bad judgment not only to plan a venture of unlawful drug distribution, but also to sell five pounds of illegal drugs to a government informant. The marijuana-for-money exchange resulted in a search of Neiss’s home, where Daychild also had resided for a week or two. There, law enforcement agents found what they sought and perhaps more: firearms, including an unregistered machine gun, and an additional seven to eight pounds of marijuana. After a jury trial, Daychild and Neiss were both convicted in the United States District Court for the District of Montana of conspiracy to possess and/or distribute marijuana, and of unlawful distribution of marijuana. Neiss was also found guilty of unlawfully possessing with intent to distribute an additional stash of marijuana, and of unlawfully possessing a machine gun in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922 (o). Daychild was sentenced to thirty-three months’ imprisonment and Neiss to forty-four months’ imprisonment. On appeal, Daychild and Neiss both seek dismissal of their indictments on speedy trial grounds, and contend that the government used insufficient evidence to link them to a conspiracy.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.