Richard D. Peterson v. Hewlett-Packard Co., a Corporation

Caution
358 F.3d 599·2004 WL 26580·84 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,559·92 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1761·2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 72
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 6, 200401-35795California4,007 words

Opinion

Opinion

Reinhardt, J.

In this religious discrimination action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. and Idaho law, Richard Peterson claims that his former employer, the HewletL-Packard Company, engaged in disparate treatment by terminating him on account of his religious views and that it failed to accommodate his religious beliefs. The district court granted Hewlett-Packard’s motion for summary judgment on the grounds that: 1) Peterson failed to raise an inference of disparate treatment and 2) accommodating Peterson’s beliefs would inflict undue hardship upon Hewlett-Packard. We affirm.

I. Background

Peterson was employed in the Boise, Idaho office of Hewlett-Packard for almost 21 years prior to his termination. The parties do not dispute that Peterson’s job performance was satisfactory. The conflict between Peterson and Hewlett-Packard arose when the company began displaying “diversity posters” in its Boise office as one component of its workplace diversity campaign. The first series consisted of five posters, each showing a photograph of a Hewlett-Packard employee above the caption “Black,” “Blonde,” “Old,” “Gay,” or “Hispanic.” Posters in the second series…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.