Ronald Ray Smith v. Pacific Properties And Development Corporation

Good Law
358 F.3d 1097·1 Accom. Disabilities Dec. (CCH) 11·2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 1092
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 26, 200403-15656California5,046 words

Opinion

Opinion

358 F.3d 1097 Ronald Ray SMITH, Plaintiff, and Disabled Rights Action Committee, a Utah non-profit corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PACIFIC PROPERTIES AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation, Defendant-Appellee. No. 03-15656. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted December 5, 2003 — San Francisco, California. Filed January 26, 2004. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Richard F. Armknecht, Armknecht & Cowdell, Lindon, Utah, for Plaintiff-Appellant Disabled Rights Action Committee. Glenn F. Meier, Howard, Meier & Fine, Kolesar & Leatham, Las Vegas, Nevada, for Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Lloyd D. George, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-01-01277-LDG. Before: MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS, RICHARD A. PAEZ, and MARSHA S. BERZON, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge Hawkins OPINION MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS, Circuit Judge. 1 In a case of first impression, we must decide whether a disabled person seeking to enforce rights created by § 3604(f)(2) of the Fair Housing Amendments Act ("FHAA"), Pub.L. No. 100-430, 102 Stat. 1619 (codified as amended at 42 U.S.C. §§…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.