Siddiqui v. United States

Good Law
359 F.3d 1200·93 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1305·2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 4459
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 9, 200402-17123California2,200 words

Opinion

Opinion

359 F.3d 1200 Zariq SIDDIQUI, husband; Greta L. Siddiqui, wife; Joseph Vullo; Elizabeth A. Vullo, wife; Vullo, No. Siddiqui & Associates, Ltd., an Arizona corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee. No. 02-17123. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted February 11, 2004 — San Francisco, California. Filed March 9, 2004. A. Jerry Busby, Phoenix, Arizona, for the plaintiffs-appellants. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Department of Justice, Tax Division, WA, Washington, D.C., for the defendant-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona; Roslyn O. Silver, District Judge, Presiding, D.C. No. CV 99-01596-ROS. Before: Arthur L. ALARCÓN, Robert R. BEEZER, and William A. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge Alarcón. OPINION ALARCÓN, Circuit Judge. 1 Zariq and Greta Siddiqui, Joseph, Richard and Elizabeth Vullo, and Vullo, Siddiqui & Associates, Ltd. ("VSA") (collectively, "Appellants") appeal from the district court's limitation of its award under 26 U.S.C. § 7431 to a total of $6,000 in statutory damages, and the denial of punitive damages…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.