Walter Grande v. Merrick Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 1, 202217-70257California644 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 1 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
WALTER ALFREDO GRANDE, No. 17-70257
Petitioner, Agency No. A200-242-250
v.
MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted July 27, 2022** Pasadena, California
Before: TASHIMA, WATFORD, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.
Walter Alfredo Grande (“Petitioner”), a native and citizen of El Salvador,
petitions for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”),
affirming a decision of an Immigration Judge (“IJ” and, collectively with the BIA,
“the Agency”) denying his applications for withholding of removal and protection
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). “We review factual…