Walter Grande v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 1, 202217-70257California644 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 1 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WALTER ALFREDO GRANDE, No. 17-70257

Petitioner, Agency No. A200-242-250

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 27, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: TASHIMA, WATFORD, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Walter Alfredo Grande (“Petitioner”), a native and citizen of El Salvador,

petitions for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”),

affirming a decision of an Immigration Judge (“IJ” and, collectively with the BIA,

“the Agency”) denying his applications for withholding of removal and protection

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). “We review factual…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.