People v. Lubrin CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 1, 2022G060424California8,953 words

Opinion

Opinion

Goethals, J.

Filed 8/1/22 P. v. Lubrin et al. CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

THE PEOPLE,

G060424

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. C1519377) v.

OPI NION

JEREH CATBAGAN LUBRIN, RAFAEL

RODRIGUEZ, AND MATTHEW

THOMAS FARRIS,

Defendants and Appellants.

Appeal from judgments of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County, David A. Cena, Judge. Reversed and remanded. Law Offices of Goyette & Associates, Heather N. Phillips, Sarah E. Tobias; Goyette, Ruano & Thompson, Paul Q. Goyette and Janelle Crandall for Defendant and Appellant Jereh Catbagan Lubrin. Rebecca P. Jones for Defendant and Appellant Rafael Rodriguez. Eric S. Multhaup for Defendant and Appellant Matthew Thomas Farris. Xavier Becerra and Rob Bonta, Attorneys General, Lance E. Winters, Chief Assistant Attorney General,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.