People v. Hill CA1/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 2, 2022A164599California1,725 words

Opinion

Opinion

BACKGROUND

A. Conviction and Sentencing In 2008, Hill was convicted of first degree murder (§ 187, subd. (a)) and sentenced to life in prison without parole, plus a consecutive 10-year term for a firearm use enhancement (§ 12022.53, subd. (b)), and a one-year term for an arming enhancement (§ 12022, subd. (a)(1)). Hill was ordered to pay a $10,000 restitution fine (§ 1202.4, sub.(b)); $7,500 in victim restitution; a $20 court security fee (§ 1465.8); and a $100 probation investigation fee (§ 1203.1, subd. (b)). Hill appealed. We stayed the one-year term imposed pursuant to section 12022, subdivision (a)(1), and affirmed the conviction. (People v. Hill, supra, A124123 & A124244.) B. Section 1465.9 In 2020, the Legislature passed Assembly Bill No. 1869 (2019–2020 Reg. Sess.) (Assembly Bill 1869). Assembly Bill 1869 recognized that court- ordered fines and fees are “often assigned to people who simply cannot afford to pay them,” and “make poor people, their families, and their communities poorer.” (Stats. 2020, ch. 92, § 2.) Its stated intent was “to eliminate the range of administrative fees that agencies and courts are authorized to impose to fund elements of the criminal legal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.