Paul Holland v. Allied Universal Security Svc

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 2, 202221-16004California858 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 2 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PAUL HOLLAND, No. 21-16004

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 19-cv-02545-SI

v. MEMORANDUM*

ALLIED UNIVERSAL SECURITY SER-

VICES AND MARK HANKINS,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Susan Illston, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 29, 2022** San Francisco, California

Before: GRABER and OWENS, Circuit Judges, and BAKER,*** International Trade Judge.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable M. Miller Baker, Judge for the United States Court of International Trade, sitting by designation. Late at night, private security guards (“the guards”) detected Paul Holland and

another man and their vehicles just outside…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.