Pacesetter Consulting, LLC v. Herbert Kapreilian

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 2, 202221-16244California1,578 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 2 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PACESETTER CONSULTING, LLC, an No. 21-16244 Arizona limited liability company, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-00388-DWL Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM*

HERBERT A. KAPREILIAN, a California citizen; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

DANIEL DUDA, a Florida citizen; et al.,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Dominic Lanza, District Judge, Presiding

Argued in part and submitted July 25, 2022 Pasadena, California

Before: TASHIMA, WATFORD, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Pacesetter Consulting, LLC (“Pacesetter”) appeals from the district court’s

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. grant of summary judgment in favor of AgriCare, Inc. and Tom Avenelis (the

“AgriCare Defendants”); Eastside Packing, Inc., Fruit World Nursery, Inc., and

Craig and Herbert Kapreilian (the “Kapreilian Defendants”); and Mark…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.