People v. Newens CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 3, 2022C094163California997 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/3/22 P. v. Newens CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Butte) ----

THE PEOPLE, C094163

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 19CF06083)

v.

JOSHUA DANIEL NEWENS,

Defendant and Appellant.

A jury found defendant Joshua Daniel Newens guilty of two counts of robbery (Pen. Code, § 211—counts 1 & 2) 1 and four counts of criminal threats. (§ 422, subd. (a)—counts 3-6.) In a bifurcated proceeding, the trial court found true the enhancement allegations that defendant had suffered two prior strike convictions (§§ 667, subd. (d), 1170.12, subd. (b)) and that defendant had suffered two prior serious felony convictions.

Undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code.

1 (§ 667, subd.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.