United States v. Rickon Wade
Opinion
Opinion
facts, we do not recount them here. We affirm.
Wade challenges the district court’s application of a sentencing enhancement
under U.S.S.G. § 2B1.1(b)(11)(C)(i), which applies if the offense involved “the
unauthorized transfer or use of any means of identification unlawfully to produce
or obtain any other means of identification.” U.S.S.G. § 2B1.1(b)(11)(C)(i). Wade
contends that the enhancement does not apply because he used a means of
identification belonging to someone else to attempt to obtain a Nevada Real ID
under his own name—rather than another’s name—and Application Note
provides that, for § 2B1.1(b), “means of identification, shall be of an actual (i.e.,
not fictitious) individual, other than the defendant.” Id. § 2B1.1 cmt. n.
(emphasis added). Even though Wade attempted to obtain a Nevada Real ID in his
own name, the district court properly applied the enhancement because the Nevada
Real ID he sought to obtain would have contained a Nevada ID number—a “means
2 of identification”—that would have been unlawfully tied to the alien registration
number of another actual individual.