United States v. Rickon Wade

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 3, 202221-10200California364 words

Opinion

Opinion

facts, we do not recount them here. We affirm.

Wade challenges the district court’s application of a sentencing enhancement

under U.S.S.G. § 2B1.1(b)(11)(C)(i), which applies if the offense involved “the

unauthorized transfer or use of any means of identification unlawfully to produce

or obtain any other means of identification.” U.S.S.G. § 2B1.1(b)(11)(C)(i). Wade

contends that the enhancement does not apply because he used a means of

identification belonging to someone else to attempt to obtain a Nevada Real ID

under his own name—rather than another’s name—and Application Note

provides that, for § 2B1.1(b), “means of identification, shall be of an actual (i.e.,

not fictitious) individual, other than the defendant.” Id. § 2B1.1 cmt. n.

(emphasis added). Even though Wade attempted to obtain a Nevada Real ID in his

own name, the district court properly applied the enhancement because the Nevada

Real ID he sought to obtain would have contained a Nevada ID number—a “means

2 of identification”—that would have been unlawfully tied to the alien registration

number of another actual individual.

Contrary to Wade’s contention, the enhancement did not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.