Sebastian Cano-Francisco v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 3, 202217-73270California1,104 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 3 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SEBASTIAN CANO-FRANCISCO; No. 17-73270

ARDANY ERIKSON CANO-FRANCISCO,

Agency Nos. A208-260-778 Petitioners, A208-260-779

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 5, 2022** Seattle, Washington

Before: CLIFTON and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges, and CHEN,*** District Judge.

Petitioner Sebastian Cano-Francisco, a native of Guatemala with his minor

son attached as a derivative beneficiary under 8 U.S.C. § 1158(b)(3)(A), petitions

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Edward M. Chen, United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation. for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) decision…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.