Pattijo Daniels v. Northshore School District

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 3, 202221-35808California1,019 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 3 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PATTIJO DANIELS; GARY DANIELS, for No. 21-35808 themselves and as parents of minor C.D., D.C. No. 2:20-cv-01041-JCC Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v. MEMORANDUM*

NORTHSHORE SCHOOL DISTRICT,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington John C. Coughenour, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted July 7, 2022 Seattle, Washington

Before: CLIFTON and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges, and SEEBORG,** District Judge.

Plaintiffs Pattijo and Gary Daniels, individually and on behalf of their child,

C.D., appeal from the district court’s judgment granting summary judgment to

Defendant Northshore School District and affirming the determination of an

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Richard Seeborg, Chief United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.