Mohammad Ali Faruqi v. Department of Homeland Security

Good Law
360 F.3d 985·2004 WL 370018·2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 3900
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 1, 200403-56972California1,505 words

Opinion

Opinion

ORDER

We expedited this appeal and ordered briefing from the parties in order to resolve an issue affecting several other cases pending before us — that is, whether, in light of our decision in Andreiu v. Ashcroft, 253 F.3d 477 (9th Cir.2001) (en banc), we have jurisdiction over an interlocutory appeal of a district court order denying a stay of removal in a habeas corpus petition brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 . See Andreiu, 253 F.3d at 480-83 (determining that stay of removal is not equivalent to injunctive relief). We conclude that we have appellate jurisdiction over such an interlocutory appeal, under 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (a)(1).

I

Petitioner Mohammad Ali Faruqi is a native of Pakistan and a citizen of the United Kingdom. Faruqi last entered the United States on June 6, 1999 under the Visa Waiver Pilot Program (‘VWPP”), 8 U.S.C. § 1187 . Visitors admitted under this program may enter the country without a visa, and may stay a maximum of ninety days, in exchange for waiving their right to contest any action for deportation against them, unless that challenge is based upon an application for asylum. 8 U.S.C. § 1187 (b)(2). Such visitors are ineligible for adjustment of status,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.