Richard Wright v. Oregon Metallurgical Corporation

Good Law
360 F.3d 1090
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 11, 200402-35853California6,104 words

Opinion

Opinion

360 F.3d 1090 Richard WRIGHT; Greg S. Buchanan; and Darell Hagan, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. OREGON METALLURGICAL CORPORATION, dba Oremet Titanium; Carlos Aguirre; Dennis Opinion P. Kelly; Gary Weber; Jack Cox; Key Trust Company of the Northwest; and United Steel Workers of America Local 7150, Defendants-Appellees. No. 02-35853. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted January 7, 2004 — Seattle, Washington. Filed March 11, 2004. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Gary D. Greenwald (argued), Columbus, Ohio; Anne Marie La Bue, Columbus, Ohio; James C. Egan, Albany, Oregon, for the plaintiffs-appellants. Douglas L. Greenfield, Washington, D.C.; Leon Dayan, Washington, D.C. (argued), for defendant-appellee United Steelworkers of America Local 7150. Brian T. Ortelere, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (argued); Amy Promislo, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for defendants-appellees Oregon Metallurgical Corp., Carlos E. Aguirre, Dennis P. Kelly, Gary Weber, and Jack Cox. Brian J. Lamb, Cleveland, Ohio; Gary L. Walters, Cleveland, Ohio, for defendant-appellee Key Trust Company of the Northwest. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon; Anna J.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.