In re A.M. CA2/8

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 4, 2022B316350California3,255 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wiley, J.

Filed 8/4/22 In re A.M. CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION EIGHT

In re A.M., a Person Coming B316350 Under the Juvenile Court Law. ______________________________ Los Angeles County LOS ANGELES COUNTY Super. Ct. No. 19CCJP02631A

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN

AND FAMILY SERVICES,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

R.D. et al.,

Defendants and Appellants.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Daniel Zeke Zeidler, Judge. Affirmed. Christopher R. Booth, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant R.D. Caitlin Christian, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant S.M. Dawyn R. Harrison, Acting County…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.