Kristopher Speight v. Ken Clark

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 4, 202221-16203California886 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 4 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KRISTOPHER DESHAWN SPEIGHT, No. 21-16203

Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:15-cv-00209-JKS

v.

MEMORANDUM*

KEN CLARK, Warden,

Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California James K. Singleton, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted July 25, 2022 San Francisco, California

Before: GRABER and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges, and BAKER,** International Trade Judge.

Petitioner Kristopher Speight filed a federal habeas petition challenging his

California conviction for sexual penetration in concert with Orlindo Antonio

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable M. Miller Baker, Judge for the United States Court of International Trade, sitting by designation. Myles. The district court denied the petition, and this timely appeal followed. On

de novo review, Dows v. Wood, 211 F.3d 480, 484 (9th Cir. 2000), we…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.