Lee v. Barrigan CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 5, 2022E076929California2,394 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/5/22 Lee v. Barrigan CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

SUE LEE,

Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and E076929 Appellant, (Super.Ct.No. CIVDS1710326) v.

OPINION

JOSE BARRIGAN,

Defendant, Cross-complainant and Respondent.

APPEAL from the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. Thomas S. Garza,

Judge. Affirmed.

Vasu Vijayraghavan for Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Appellant.

No Appearance for Defendant, Cross-complainant and Respondent.

Plaintiff, cross-defendant and appellant Sue Lee (Lee) appeals the denial of her

motion for relief from default brought pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 473,

1 subdivision (b)1 (the Motion). This case involves a property dispute between Lee and

defendant, cross-complainant and respondent Jose…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.