Granado

Granado v. Faqih CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 5, 2022E076010California966 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/5/22 Granado v. Faqih CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

HEATHER GRANADO,

Plaintiff and Respondent, E076010

v. (Super.Ct.No. COC2003299)

JASMINE CHRISTINE FAQIH, OPINION

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. Craig G. Riemer, Judge.

Dismissed.

Ensberg Law Group and Stephen E. Ensberg, for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

In this restraining order action, defendant and appellant Jasmine Christine Faqih

contends that the trial court erred when it granted plaintiff and respondent Heather

Granado’s civil harassment restraining order against…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.