Strong

People v. Strong

Bad Law
13 Cal. 5th 698·296 Cal. Rptr. 3d 686·514 P.3d 265
Supreme Court of CaliforniaAugust 8, 2022S266606California8,439 words

Opinion

Opinion

Kruger, J.

Opinion of the Court by Kruger, J.

In Senate Bill No. 1437 (2017–2018 Reg. Sess.) (Senate Bill 1437), the Legislature significantly narrowed the scope of the felony-murder rule. It also created a path to relief for defendants who had previously been convicted of murder on a felony-murder theory but who could not have been convicted under the new law. Resentencing is available under the new law if the defendant neither killed nor intended to kill and was not “a major participant in the underlying felony [who] acted with reckless indifference to human life, as described in subdivision (d) of [Penal Code] Section 190.2.” (Pen. Code, § 189, subd. (e)(3); see id., § 1172.6; Stats. 2018, ch. 1015, §§ 3–4; Stats. 2022, ch. 58, § 10.) This provision repurposes preexisting law governing felony-murder special-circumstance findings — the findings a jury makes in felony-murder cases to determine whether the defendant may be sentenced to death or life without possibility of parole (Pen. Code, § 190.2, subd. (d)) — to define eligibility for sentencing relief. In this case, defendant Christopher Strong seeks resentencing even though the jury that convicted him of felony murder in 2014 also…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.