Julio Cuxum-Alvarado v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 8, 202220-73809California466 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

AUG 8 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JULIO CUXUM-ALVARADO, No. 20-73809

Petitioner, Agency No. A201-030-311

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of an Immigration Judge

Submitted July 29, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: PAEZ and WATFORD, Circuit Judges, and BENNETT,*** District Judge.

Julio Cuxum-Alvarado, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for

review of a decision of an immigration judge (IJ) upholding an asylum officer’s

negative reasonable fear determination. We deny the petition for review.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Richard D. Bennett, United States District Judge for the District of Maryland, sitting by designation. Page 2 of

1. Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s determination…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.