Jose Merino-Abarca v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 8, 202217-70870California715 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 8 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE GABINO MERINO-ABARCA, No. 17-70870

Petitioner, Agency No. A206-408-258

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 26, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: PAEZ and WATFORD, Circuit Judges, and BENNETT,*** District Judge.

Jose Merino-Abarca petitions for review of a decision of the Board of

Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing his appeal from an order of an immigration

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Richard D. Bennett, United States District Judge for the District of Maryland, sitting by designation. Page 2 of

judge (IJ) denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and

protection under the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.