Diana Vasquez-Castillo v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 8, 202220-72565California885 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 8 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DIANA ASTRID VASQUEZ-CASTILLO; No. 20-72565

MARIO CRISTOPHER GARCIA

VASQUEZ, Agency Nos. A208-175-115

A208-175-116

Petitioners,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 4, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: CALLAHAN and H. THOMAS, Circuit Judges, and HUMETEWA,*** District Judge.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Diane J. Humetewa, United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation. Petitioner Diana Vasquez-Castillo1, a native and citizen of El Salvador,

petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.