United States v. Abdulraouf Shahir Batterjee, AKA Abdul Raouf Shahir Batterjee

Good Law
361 F.3d 1210·2004 WL 574839·2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 5479
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 24, 200403-10152California3,885 words

Opinion

Opinion

Alarcon, J.

Abdulraouf Shahir Batterjee appeals from the judgment of conviction for being a non-immigrant alien in possession of a firearm and a non-immigrant alien in possession of ammunition in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922 (g)(5)(B), 924(a)(2). He contends that because federal officials affirmatively misled him as to his eligibility to possess firearms and ammunition under § 922(g)(5), the district court erred in rejecting his affirmative defense of entrapment by estoppel. We reverse because we conclude that the undisputed evidence establishes the defense of entrapment by estoppel.

I

Mr. Batterjee is a citizen of Saudi Arabia. He was admitted into the United States on a non-immigrant student visa in 1992 to study at Arizona State University. On the dates Mr. Batterjee purchased the firearm and ammunition that are the subject of his convictions, he was lawfully present in the United States on a non-immigrant H-l visa.

On April 18, 2001, Mr. Batterjee went to the Shooting Star gun shop in Tempe, Arizona to receive a firearm he had purchased from a gun manufacturer, Springfield Armory, Inc. Shooting Star is a federal firearms licensee. That designation permits Shooting Star to sell…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.