United States v. Javid Naghani

Good Law
361 F.3d 1255·2004 WL 595354·2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 5699
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 26, 200402-50168California3,281 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fisher, J.

Sixteen days after September 11, 2001, Javid Naghani, a passenger on Air Canada Flight 792, went to the lavatory shortly after take-off from Los Angeles International Airport and lit a cigarette, setting off a smoke alarm. When flight attendants came to investigate, a verbal confrontation ensued, beginning with Naghani’s initial refusal to admit to smoking or reveal where he had put whatever had caused the smoke and concluding with Na-ghani’s purported threat that either he or his people would “kill all Americans.” Na-ghani, an Iranian national and United States resident alien who speaks with an accent, denied making these remarks or refusing to cooperate. A jury nonetheless convicted him, and the district court sentenced him to 33 months imprisonment for interfering with the duties of flight attendants in violation of 49 U.S.C. § 46504 .

Naghani now appeals on five grounds, arguing that: (1) § 46504 is unconstitutionally void for vagueness as applied to some of his actions; (2) the jury may have relied on an impermissible legal theory in convicting him; (3) there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction; (4) the district court erroneously failed to instruct the jury…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.