Marcelino Ramirez Martinez v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 9, 202220-72907California481 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 9 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARCELINO RAMIREZ MARTINEZ, No. 20-72907

Petitioner, Agency No. A088-761-482

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 29, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: PAEZ and WATFORD, Circuit Judges, and BENNETT,*** District Judge.

Petitioner Marcelino Ramirez Martinez (“Ramirez Martinez”), a native and

citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Richard D. Bennett, United States District Judge for the District of Maryland, sitting by designation. (“BIA”) denial of his motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction

under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.