Carlos Ortega-Greenham v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 9, 202221-70941California733 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 9 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CARLOS ORTEGA-GREENHAM, No. 21-70941

Petitioner, Agency No. A077-590-650 v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney MEMORANDUM* General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 4, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: CALLAHAN and H. THOMAS, Circuit Judges, and HUMETEWA,*** District Judge.

Petitioner Carlos Ortega-Greenham, a deaf Mexican citizen, appeals a 1999

Notice of Order of Expedited Removal and a 2021 Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”)

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Diane J. Humetewa, United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation. determination that he lacked a reasonable fear of persecution or torture. We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.