People v. Cook CA1/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 9, 2022A161600California5,620 words

Opinion

Opinion

Miller, J.

Filed 8/9/22 P. v. Cook CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

A161600

EARL STANLEY COOK, JR.,

Defendant and Appellant. (San Mateo County Super. Ct. No. 20–SF–001729–A)

A jury found defendant Earl Stanley Cook, Jr. (defendant) guilty of elder abuse, making criminal threats, and dissuading a witness. The victim in all three offenses was defendant’s father, Earl Cook, Sr. (Cook, Sr.), and he refused to testify against his son at trial. Defendant raises two evidentiary claims on appeal. He contends the trial court erred in admitting evidence of (1) Cook, Sr.’s statements to the police that defendant threatened to kill him and (2) a text message Cook, Sr. received after defendant was arrested. Finding no error, we…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.