City of Citrus Heights v. Ho CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 10, 2022C094299California6,119 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hoch, J.

Filed 8/10/22 City of Citrus Heights v. Ho CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento) ----

CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS, C094299

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 34-2021- 00292266-CU-PT-GDS) v.

PETER Y. HO,

Defendant and Appellant.

After receiving a number of neighbor complaints, conducting an inspection pursuant to a warrant, and failing to obtain defendant homeowner Peter Ho’s compliance with a notice to abate, plaintiff City of Citrus Heights (Citrus Heights) filed a petition for an order to abate a public nuisance at defendant’s residence and for the appointment of a receiver. The trial court granted the petition and appointed a receiver despite defendant’s claim that he had not been personally…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.