Patricia Holloway v. Clackamas River Water

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 10, 202220-35888California650 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 10 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PATRICIA HOLLOWAY, No. 20-35888

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:13-cv-01787-AC

v.

MEMORANDUM*

CLACKAMAS RIVER WATER; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Marco A. Hernandez, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 10, 2022**

Before: WALLACE, D.W. NELSON, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.

Patricia Holloway, a former commissioner on the board of Clackamas River

Water, appeals from the district court’s judgment dismissing with prejudice her

First Amendment retaliation claim brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 following

remand from our court. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Holloway’s request for oral argument,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.