People v. Lozano CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 10, 2022C094245California7,044 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/10/22 P. v. Lozano CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento) ----

THE PEOPLE, C094245

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 05F00498)

v.

ANTHONY DAVID LOZANO,

Defendant and Appellant.

After over 11 years housed in a state hospital pending trial, the trial court found defendant Anthony David Lozano was a sexually violent predator (SVP) and civilly committed him. Defendant appeals this commitment contending the trial court abused its discretion by: (1) denying his Marsden1 motions; and (2) denying his motion for a continuance to file a motion for dismissal based on a violation of his due process right to

People v. Marsden (1970) 2 Cal.3d 118.

1 a timely trial. We find no…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.