People v. Dunbar CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 10, 2022C094363California6,027 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/10/22 P. v. Dunbar CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Placer) ----

THE PEOPLE, C094363

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 62-177594A)

v.

DAVID ROY DUNBAR,

Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant David Roy Dunbar was convicted of several offenses he committed following a traffic stop. The trial court sentenced defendant to a jail term of four years and four months, which includes an upper term sentence. On appeal, defendant seeks to challenge various aspects of his case: the legality of the patdown search during the traffic stop, trial counsel’s performance as constitutionally ineffective, the trial court’s failure to remove counsel despite an irreconcilable conflict, and his sentence in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.