El Pegasus v. Kaye CA2/5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 10, 2022B310491California2,927 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/10/22 El Pegasus v. Kaye CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

EL PEGASUS LLC, et al., B310491

Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 20BBCV00157) v.

DEBRA KAYE, et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, William D. Stewart, Judge. Affirmed.

Law Offices of Steffanie Stelnick and Steffanie Stelnick for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Shawn Kaye, in pro. per. and Debra Kaye, in pro. per. for Defendants and Respondents.

__________________________ Plaintiffs El Pegasus, LLC and Marvin Blum challenge the trial court’s sustaining, without leave to amend, defendants Debra and Shawn Kaye’s demurrer to plaintiffs’ unlawful…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.