People v. Ibanez CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 10, 2022A159525California9,064 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fujisaki, J.

Filed 8/10/22 P. v. Ibanez CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

A159525

v. PEDRO ERASMO DIAZ IBANEZ, (Sonoma County Super. Ct. No. SCR-722520-1) Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant Pedro Ibanez appeals after a jury convicted him of several counts of lewd acts against two minor victims and found true multiple-victim allegations under the “One Strike” law. On appeal, defendant contends that: (1) the trial court erroneously excluded evidence; (2) his trial counsel was ineffective; (3) the court incorrectly and confusingly responded to a question from the jury; and (4) cumulative prejudice requires reversal. We affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Defendant was charged with four counts of sexual…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.