People v. Ibanez CA1/3
Opinion
Opinion
Fujisaki, J.
Filed 8/10/22 P. v. Ibanez CA1/
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION THREE
THE PEOPLE,
Plaintiff and Respondent,
A159525
v. PEDRO ERASMO DIAZ IBANEZ, (Sonoma County Super. Ct. No. SCR-722520-1) Defendant and Appellant.
Defendant Pedro Ibanez appeals after a jury convicted him of several counts of lewd acts against two minor victims and found true multiple-victim allegations under the “One Strike” law. On appeal, defendant contends that: (1) the trial court erroneously excluded evidence; (2) his trial counsel was ineffective; (3) the court incorrectly and confusingly responded to a question from the jury; and (4) cumulative prejudice requires reversal. We affirm.