Parabia
Parabia v. Wells Fargo Bank CA4/1
Opinion
Opinion
Buchanan, J.
Filed 8/11/22 Parabia v. Wells Fargo Bank CA4/
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
PERIN F. PARABIA, D079320
Plaintiff and Appellant,
v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2017-00017759-
CU-OR-CTL)
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,
Defendant and Respondent.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Kenneth J. Medel, Judge. Affirmed. Darren J. Bogié, for Plaintiff and Appellant. Lagerlof, Jeremy E. Shulman, and Michael Rapkine, for Defendant and Respondent. Dr. Perin F. Parabia appeals from a judgment entered after the trial court sustained Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.’s (Wells Fargo) demurrer to Dr. Parabia’s first amended complaint without leave to amend. We find no error and affirm the judgment.