Ussec

Ussec v. Robert Yang

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 11, 202221-55437California1,141 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 11 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

U.S. SECURITIES & EXCHANGE No. 21-55437

COMMISSION,

D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellee, 5:15-cv-02387-SVW-KK

v.

MEMORANDUM*

ROBERT YANG; et al.,

Defendants-Appellants,

and

CLAUDIA KANO; et al.,

Defendants,

v.

CELTIC BANK,

Third-party-defendant, ______________________________

STEPHEN J. DONELL,

Receiver.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Page 2 of

Stephen V. Wilson, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted July 29, 2022 Pasadena, California

Before: PAEZ and WATFORD, Circuit Judges, and BENNETT,** District Judge.

Defendant Robert Yang and relief defendants Yanrob’s Medical, Inc.

(Yanrob), HealthPro Capital Partners, LLC (HealthPro), and Suncor Care, Inc.

(Suncor Care) appeal from the district court’s judgment imposing disgorgement

and civil penalties pursuant to consent…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.