United States v. Carlos Mejia-Quintanilla

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 11, 202217-15899California730 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

AUG 11 2022

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 17-15899

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. Nos. 3:16-cv-03591-CRB 3:11-cr-00293-CRB-2 v. Northern District of California, San Francisco

CARLOS MEJIA-QUINTANILLA, AKA

Wilfredo Oliva-Castro, AKA Sleepy,

ORDER

Defendant-Appellant.

Before: S.R. THOMAS, IKUTA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Appellee’s petition for panel rehearing (Dkt. 62) is GRANTED. The

memorandum disposition filed September 21, 2021, is withdrawn. It may not be

cited by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit. A new

memorandum disposition is filed simultaneously with the filing of this order. The

parties may file petitions for rehearing and petitions for rehearing en banc in

response to the new memorandum disposition, as allowed by the Federal Rules of

Appellate Procedure.

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

AUG 11 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.