Harpinder Chahal v. Merrick Garland

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 11 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HARPINDER S. CHAHAL; GURMEET K. No. 17-70330

CHAHAL,

Agency Nos. A078-361-295 Petitioners, A078-361-296

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 9, 2022** Seattle, Washington

Before: CHRISTEN, LEE, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Harpinder Chahal and his wife, Gurmeet Chahal, petition for review

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) order denying their fifth motion to

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). reopen removal proceedings.1 We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we

deny the petition.

We “review the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen for an abuse of discretion.”

Hernandez-Ortiz…