Abel Ordonez Mendoza v. Merrick Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 11, 202220-72722California544 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
AUG 11 2022
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ABEL AMILCAR ORDONEZ No. 20-72722
MENDOZA,
Agency No. A073-916-751 Petitioner,
v. MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted August 9, 2022** Anchorage, Alaska
Before: S.R. THOMAS, McKEOWN, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
Petitioner Abel Amilcar Ordonez Mendoza petitions for review of the Board
of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order adopting the decision of an Immigration
Judge (“IJ”) denying his motion to reopen an in absentia order of deportation. We
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny the petition. Because the
parties are familiar with the facts, we need not recount them here.