Murphy v. Schneider National, Inc.

362 F.3d 1133 Charles E. MURPHY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SCHNEIDER NATIONAL, INC., a Wisconsin Corporation; Trane Company, a Wisconsin corporation; American Standard Inc., a Delaware Corporation; and Schneider Specialized Carriers, Inc., Defendants-Appellees. No. 02-35116. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted September 9, 2003. Filed November 21, 2003. Amended March 22, 2004. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Montgomery W. Cobb, Cobb & Bossé, LLP, Portland, OR, for the plaintiff-appellant. Wade R. Kennon, The Gilroy Law Firm, P.C., Portland, OR, for defendant-appellee Schneider. James N. Westwood, Leta E. Gorman, Stoel Rives LLP, Portland, OR, for defendant-appellee Trane. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon; Ancer L. Haggerty, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-01-00028-HA. Before: ALDISERT, * HALL, and GOULD, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 The opinion published at 349 F.3d 1224 (9th Cir.2003) is amended to add the following footnote at the end of the second sentence in Part III.C: 2 A forum non conveniens motion, as opposed to a motion to transfer based on 28 U.S.C. § 1404 (a), is appropriate in this case…