People v. Zepeda-Onofre CA1/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 12, 2022A162223California7,185 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/12/22 P. v. Zepeda-Onofre CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

A162223

v. AUGUSTIN ZEPEDA-ONOFRE, (Sonoma County Super. Ct. No. SCR6095252) Defendant and Appellant.

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, A162241 v. (Sonoma County Super Ct.

SIDONIO CRUZ-SANTOS,

No. SCR6095251) Defendant and Appellant.

On October 15, 2011, Gabino Santiago Lopez 1 and his roommate, Conrado Valentin Cruz, joined Ramon Lopez Velasco, Augustin Zepeda- Onofre, and Sidonio Cruz-Santos in a marijuana garden outside of Healdsburg, California to celebrate the end of the work week by eating, drinking beer, and snorting cocaine. Augustin and Sidonio were armed with

We follow the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.