United States v. Enrique Galindo

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 12, 202221-10251California632 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 12 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-10251

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:19-cr-00215-APG-VCF-1 v.

ENRIQUE GALINDO, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Andrew P. Gordon, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 10, 2022** San Francisco, California

Before: RAWLINSON, BADE, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Defendant-Appellant Enrique Galindo appeals the district court’s denial of

his motion to suppress evidence and its imposition of a condition of supervised

release requiring him to notify third parties about the “specific risks posed by [his]

criminal record” if his probation officer so directs him (“Condition 12”). We have

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.