United States v. Edward Gentry

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 12, 202222-30002California4,621 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 12 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-30002

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:15-cr-05190-BHS-1 v.

EDWARD T GENTRY, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Benjamin H. Settle, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted May 18, 2022 Seattle, Washington

Before: WARDLAW, GOULD, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges. Dissent by Judge BENNETT

Edward Gentry appeals the district court’s revocation of supervised release

following an evidentiary hearing at which the district court found that Gentry

committed vehicular assault under Washington Revised Code § 46.61.522. Gentry

argues that the district court erred in relying on hearsay testimony regarding the

speed at which he was traveling and the circumstances of the accident, without

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. providing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.