Julio Hernandez Olivos v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 12, 202219-72380California287 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 12 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JULIO HERNANDEZ OLIVOS, AKA Julio No. 19-72380 Hernandez, Agency No. A215-855-171 Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney Gen- eral,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 10, 2022** Anchorage, Alaska

Before: S.R. THOMAS, McKEOWN, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

Julio Hernandez Olivos, a native of Mexico, seeks review of a decision of the

Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming the Immigration Judge’s denial of

a continuance and denying petitioner’s motion to remand. We review both decisions

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). for abuse of discretion. Orozco-Lopez v. Garland, 11 F.4th 764, 774 (9th Cir. 2021)

(continuance); Taggar v. Holder,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.