George Engasser v. Tetra Tech, Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 12, 202221-55217California1,350 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 12 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GEORGE ENGASSER, an individual, No. 21-55217

Plaintiff, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-07973-ODW-PLA v.

TETRA TECH, INC., a Delaware corporation, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-third-party- plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

MECHOOPDA CULTURAL RESOURCE

PRESERVATION ENTERPRISE,

Third-party-defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Otis D. Wright II, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted July 15, 2022 Pasadena, California

Before: BENNETT and COLLINS, Circuit Judges, and FOOTE,** District Judge.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Elizabeth E. Foote, United States District Judge for the Western District of Louisiana, sitting by designation. Appellant Tetra Tech appeals the dismissal of its third-party complaint against

appellee Mechoopda Cultural Resource Preservation Enterprise (“MCRPE”) for

lack of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.